ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2026
Emergency medicine advances healthcare systems: the importance of recognizing EM as a specialty.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency Medicine (EM) is facing a global crisis. System demands and utilization are increasing, while resources are constrained, putting society's healthcare safety net at risk. In order to approach this crisis, many areas of reform have been suggested (Heymann et al. in Intern Emerg Med, 2024). The first step is the recognition of EM as a specialty of its own. This will give Emergency Physicians (EPs) the potential to take control of their profession. Similar to other examples of bottom-up and horizontalization approaches ( Laloux, F., & Wilber, K. (2014). Reinventing organizations: A guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness.), empowering EPs to provide solutions to wellbeing and resilience issues can only occur if EPs are allowed to organize and control their training, activity, research, and field of action. Traditional models have seen EM as a subspecialty or a secondary degree completed after initial training in an already established profession (e.g., internal medicine). These models ultimately result in longer training pathways and risk trainee and trainer fatigue. Furthermore, in these models, the profession is directed by specialties who do not face the daily challenges of modern EM. The following paper discusses the advantages of recognizing EM as a specialty and how this benefits wellbeing and resilience. The result is that EM recognition protects a cornerstone of the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41559254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.