Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559240›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026

Valorisation of spent mushroom substrate by secondary microbial fermentation.

P W Baker, R Bragança, A J Lloyd, A Charlton

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P W BakerBiocomposites Centre, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, Wales, UK.
R BragançaBiocomposites Centre, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, Wales, UK.
A J LloydDepartment of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3DA, Wales, UK. abl@aber.ac.uk.
A CharltonBiocomposites Centre, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global mushroom production exceeds 45 million tonnes, involving growth on a lignocellulosic substrate. More than 70% of these mushrooms are considered wild mushrooms that are grown on a lignocellulose substrate. At the end of the growth cycle, the remaining spent mushroom substrate (SMS) is considered waste with little value and is often discarded. The limited information available on the fibre content remaining in SMS indicates that different white-rot fungi can result in significant differences in the hemicellulose and lignin content, which in turn may impact the second fermentation step. Secondary fermentation has found uses in the production of biofuels, as a preserved ruminant feed, for enzyme production, in the formation of microbial compounds, and as an amended fertiliser. Finally, achieving secondary fermentation of SMS could involve the development and use of larger-scale solid-state fermentation. This review article has shown that research into secondary fermentation of SMS has been a relatively new field occurring over the past 14 years.

Indexed as

AgaricalesFermentationBiofuelsLigninPolysaccharidesBiofuelshemicelluloseLigninlignocellulosePolysaccharidesCelluloseHemicelluloseLentinusPleurotusSecond stage fermentationTwo-step fermentation

Identifiers

PMID41559240
PMCPMC12823758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.