ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptation of conventional water treatment technologies for organic component removal from liquid radioactive waste: sorption and coagulation mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Temperature Thermomechanical Consolidation of Aluminosilicate Sorbents Impregnated with Model Oil-Containing Radioactive Waste.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant concentrations of artificial radionuclides have been detected in drinking water sources not only in areas contaminated by major radiation accidents, but also in the vicinity of operating nuclear power plants. Therefore, the use of effective, broad-spectrum sorbents produced from readily available Ukrainian raw materials in water treatment and purification technologies should be regarded as a strategically important social measure. However, technologies that rely on oxidation to decompose organic components require the recycling of this process. Other promising methods, such as plasma treatment, photocatalysis, and electrocatalysis, currently lack industrial-scale equipment. Meanwhile, there are established water treatment technologies that, despite their proven effectiveness, have not yet been adapted for the treatment of liquid radioactive waste (LRW). This paper investigates the potential application of conventional water treatment technologies for removing the organic component from LRW at nuclear power plants. By employing sorption (using activated carbon and powdered bentonite), coagulation (with ferric chloride), and filtration. We achieved a 75% removal efficiency of the organic component, as measured by COD(Cr) (dichromate oxidizability). The use of a 20% w/v FeCl₃ solution as a coagulant and activated carbon as a sorbent significantly enhanced the purification process. Reducing the concentration of bentonite had little effect on the degree of LRW purification, whereas increasing its concentration noticeably diminished purification efficiency. Nevertheless, the addition of bentonite as a turbidity agent substantially accelerated coagulation and sedimentation. Conversion models were developed to recalculate COD(Cr) (dichromate oxidizability) indicators into corresponding COD(Mn) (permanganate oxidizability) or total organic carbon (TOC), with prediction accuracy validated by experimental data. It should be noted that using such technologies will significantly reduce water and energy consumption, as well as saving time, all of which is extremely important in Ukraine’s current wartime economic situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.