Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cha-PO and CVNet: a hybrid approach for automated cataract detection using adaptive feature selection and deep learning for high accuracy and efficiency.

A Essaki Muthu, K Saravanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Essaki MuthuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SCAD College of Engineering and Technology, Tirunelveli, India. saravanankrish@annauniv.edu.
K SaravananDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai, 600025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of cataract is crucial for thwarting visual impairment worldwide, and the utilization of automated cataract detection through medical images has shown increased growth for several years. The automated detection model comprises image processing, feature extraction and classification process to ensure accurate identification of infected cataract eye images. However, the recent detection model endures various challenges, including complex computing requirements, feature redundancy, inadequate precision, generalization and less data diversity. To overcome these challenges, a Chaotic Adaptive Poplar-Bacteria Optimization (Cha-PO) based Cataract VisionNet (CVNet) method is proposed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency. The Cha-PO model is specifically used for optimal feature selection of fundus images by reducing the dimension of the images, which ensures acute diagnostic data preservation. CVNet model used for classifying the cataract images by applying the deep hierarchical learning mechanisms alongside optimized network parameters to boost accuracy levels and operational reliability. The proposed approach is validated using the Eye Cataract Kaggle dataset, and it outperforms the traditional models with 99.10% accuracy, 99% precision, 99.21% recall and 99.10% of F1-Score. With a 99s execution time, it requires fewer computational resources than other baseline models, making it suitable for medical diagnosis.

Indexed as

CataractDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsCataract detectionDeep learningFeature extractionFundus imagesMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID41559203
PMCPMC12868877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.