Trial reportScientific reports2026
The effect of dopamine D2-like receptor blockade on human motor performance and skill acquisition.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dopamine signalling supports motor skill learning in a variety of ways, including through an effect on cortical and striatal plasticity. One neuromodulator that has been consistently linked to motor skill learning is dopamine. However, the specific role of dopamine D2-like receptor in the acquisition and consolidation stages of motor learning remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a selective D2-like receptor antagonist on human motor skill acquisition and consolidation. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, healthy adult men and women (N = 23) completed a sequential motor skill learning task after taking either sulpiride (800 mg) or placebo. A 20-minute bout of high-intensity interval cycling exercise was included to enhance learning effects and counteract potentially confounding sedative effects of sulpiride. Results showed that sulpiride reduced performance during motor skill acquisition relative to placebo in the first session, however this difference was abolished at the subsequent retention test. Sulpiride did not reduce consolidation of learning as expected, however it led to a reduction in speed of execution relative to placebo. Our results provide preliminary evidence of a causal relationship between neuromodulation at the dopamine D2-like receptor and motor performance during early acquisition of a novel motor skill. These results may have functional relevance in motor rehabilitation as reduced dopamine transmission can impact performance during initial acquisition and slow subsequent performance of the skill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.