ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Leveraging Task FMRI Data to Extract Resting-State Metrics in Brain Tumor and Healthy Populations.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined whether task-based functional MRI (fMRI) can provide metrics of local brain activity and hemodynamics typically derived from resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI).
methodsTwo publicly open datasets from healthy individuals and brain tumor patients were retrospectively used to compare amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and global signal metrics, namely, global signal correlation (GSC), global signal cross-correlation (GSXC), and global signal time delay (GSTD) derived from motor and language fMRI with those from a reference rsfMRI scan (rest-1). Factors influencing the correlations between each measurement were examined using a mixed-effects model with post-hoc pairwise comparisons.
resultsOur study included 50 healthy subjects (mean age: 29 ± 3 years; 32 women) and 38 patients (45 ± 14 years; 24 men). Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found for all metrics between those derived from motor, language, or a second rest scan (rest-2) against rest-1 scans for both healthy subjects and patients. Both fMRI type and motion magnitude affected the measurements of healthy subjects' GSC (fMRI type: F [2, 69.1] = 15.4, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.1] = 8.5, p = 0.004), GSXC (fMRI type: F [2, 69.5] = 18.9, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.2] = 9.89, p = 0.002), and GSTD (fMRI type: F [2, 58.7] = 9.89, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.2] = 15.26, p < 0.001). FMRI type by motion interaction was significant for ALFF (F [2, 65.9] = 6.13, p = 0.004). The effects were less pronounced and observed only for GSC (F [2, 40.4] = 6.1, p = 0.005) and GSXC (F [2, 41.2] = 6.4, p = 0.004) in the clinical dataset.
conclusionRepurposing existing task-based functional MRI data for evaluating local brain activities and hemodynamics is feasible in the entire brain in healthy and brain tumor subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.