Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559174›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intention to reduce meat consumption in relation to perceived economic benefits and meat purchase expenditure among Japanese adults.

Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Makiko Sekiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kazuaki TsuchiyaSocial Systems Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan. tsuchiya.kazuaki@nies.go.jp.
Makiko SekiyamaHealth and Environmental Risk Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

Environment Research and Technology Development Fund JPMEERF20235001Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K28301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the economic factors influencing the intention to reduce meat consumption in Japan, where meat intake remains relatively low but has increased over recent decades. A web-based survey was conducted among Japanese consumers to explore the relationship between their intention to reduce meat consumption, perceived economic benefits, and meat purchase expenditure along with perceived environmental and health benefits. We found that many respondents perceived economic benefits in reducing meat consumption rather than environmental and health benefits. Meat purchase expenditure significantly and positively predicts perceived economic benefits of reduction. Furthermore, there were significant positive relationships between perceived economic benefits and the intention to reduce meat consumption. However, we also observed that the influences of perceived economic benefits on the intention to reduce meat consumption became insignificant when broader sociopsychological factors were taken into account. This result contrasts with the finding that perceived environmental and health benefits were significantly and positively associated with the intention to reduce meat consumption. These results suggest that the influence of economic factors on meat consumption reduction is likely to be limited within the respondents. Our findings indicated that economic and informational measures aimed at encouraging a shift toward sustainable and healthy diets may be appropriately combined.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorIntentionMeatAdultAgedEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultConsumer perceptionEconomic benefitsEnvironmental impactFood consumptionHealth

Identifiers

PMID41559174
PMCPMC12894846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.