ArticleScientific reports2026
Intention to reduce meat consumption in relation to perceived economic benefits and meat purchase expenditure among Japanese adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the economic factors influencing the intention to reduce meat consumption in Japan, where meat intake remains relatively low but has increased over recent decades. A web-based survey was conducted among Japanese consumers to explore the relationship between their intention to reduce meat consumption, perceived economic benefits, and meat purchase expenditure along with perceived environmental and health benefits. We found that many respondents perceived economic benefits in reducing meat consumption rather than environmental and health benefits. Meat purchase expenditure significantly and positively predicts perceived economic benefits of reduction. Furthermore, there were significant positive relationships between perceived economic benefits and the intention to reduce meat consumption. However, we also observed that the influences of perceived economic benefits on the intention to reduce meat consumption became insignificant when broader sociopsychological factors were taken into account. This result contrasts with the finding that perceived environmental and health benefits were significantly and positively associated with the intention to reduce meat consumption. These results suggest that the influence of economic factors on meat consumption reduction is likely to be limited within the respondents. Our findings indicated that economic and informational measures aimed at encouraging a shift toward sustainable and healthy diets may be appropriately combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.