Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Compressive strength prediction of carbonated recycled aggregate concrete using regression based machine learning models.

Hintsa G Gebremariam, Shifferaw Taye, Abrham Gebre Tarekegn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hintsa G GebremariamSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Technology and Built Environment, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. hintsa.gebrezgiher@adu.edu.et.
Shifferaw TayeSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Technology and Built Environment, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abrham Gebre TarekegnSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Technology and Built Environment, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonation treatment of recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) enhances aggregate performance while enabling CO₂ sequestration, thereby supporting sustainable construction practices. Despite the growing application of machine learning (ML) in concrete research, predictive modeling of concrete incorporating carbonated RCA remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates regression based ML approaches for predicting the compressive strength of concrete containing carbonated recycled coarse aggregates. A total of 108 experimentally obtained data points were compiled and statistically validated prior to model development. The input variables included water to cement ratio, cement to coarse aggregate ratio, cement to fine aggregate ratio, water absorption and crushing value of natural and recycled coarse aggregates, parent concrete strength, degree of carbonation, and replacement ratio of natural coarse aggregates with recycled aggregates. Composite indices were introduced to simplify predictive formulations and to evaluate the influence of multicollinearity. Six ML algorithms namely, multilinear regression (MLR), ridge regression, polynomial MLR, decision tree, random forest, and LightGBM were developed and optimized using 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²), supported by residual and prediction analyses. The decision tree and LightGBM models achieved the highest predictive accuracy on the test dataset, yielding RMSE of 1.59 MPa, MAE of 1.17 MPa, and R² of 0.991. The random forest model closely followed, with RMSE of 1.64 MPa, MAE of 1.25 MPa, and R² of 0.991. Polynomial MLR demonstrated moderate performance, with RMSE of 2.23 MPa, MAE of 1.89 MPa, and R² of 0.983. In contrast, conventional MLR and ridge regression exhibited lower accuracy, with RMSE values of 3.19 and 3.08 MPa, MAE of 2.65 and 2.56 MPa, and R² values of 0.965 and 0.967, respectively. The tree based ensemble models provided the most accurate and stable predictions, maintaining a maximum error range of approximately ± 13%. Although the decision tree and LightGBM models achieved marginally lower prediction errors, the random forest model was identified as the most reliable overall due to its ability to capture physically meaningful relationships, as evidenced by SHAP analysis, together with its high predictive accuracy and robustness. Composite indexing had a minimal effect on model performance. Sensitivity and SHAP analyses identified the mix proportioning index as the most influential parameter, followed by degree of carbonation and aggregate performance. Overall, the results demonstrate that ML based models, particularly tree based ensembles, effectively capture the experimental behavior of carbonated RCA concrete and enable efficient compressive strength prediction.

Indexed as

CarbonationClassical regression modelCompressive strengthMachine learningPerformance metrics

Identifiers

PMID41559170
PMCPMC12894716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.