ArticleScientific reports2026
Variations in the technical performance of elite female volleyball: evidence from a new round model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence and wearable devices in volleyball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volleyball athletes’ performance can vary between different micro-phases of the competition. This study aimed to investigate distinctions in volleyball athletes’ technical performance among rounds employing a novel volleyball round model. We further assessed how technical performance relates to attack outcome categories (point, continuation, error) across rounds. Data from 20 matches in the 2023/2024 Chinese Women’s Volleyball Super League were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple logistic regression analysis. The proposed model enabled a round-specific description of technical performance and helped reveal round-to-round variation. Technical performance varied across rounds. Associations between technical variables and attack outcomes also differed by round. In Round 1, serve type showed the strongest association with attack outcomes. The jump-float serve was the most frequently used technique, while the power jump serve was more often linked with errors. In Round 2, attacks were initiated under faster tempos, and attack tempo showed the strongest association with attack outcomes. In contrast, Round 3 presented adverse conditions for attack, with blocking exerting pronounced influences on attack outcome categories. Technical performance in Rounds 4 and 5 displayed uniform patterns and attack outcomes in these rounds were statistically comparable to those in Round 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.