ArticleScientific reports2026
Bowel incision closure with a semi-mutomated Robot-assisted laser tissue soldering system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional methods for closing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery incisions, like suturing and stapling, present significant challenges, including potentially life-threatening leaks. These techniques, especially in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS), require advanced manual skills. While their repetitive and time-consuming nature makes them suitable candidates for automation, the automation process is complicated by the need for extensive contact with the tissue. Addressing this, we demonstrate a semi-autonomous contactless surgical procedure using our novel Robot-assisted Laser Tissue Soldering (RLTS) system on a live porcine bowel. Towards this in-vivo demonstration, we optimized soldering protocols and system parameters in ex-vivo experiments on porcine bowels and a porcine cadaver. To assess the RLTS system performance, we compared the pressure at which the anastomosis leaked between our robotic soldering and manual suturing. With the best setup, we advanced to an in-vivo Heineke Mikulicz closure on small bowel incision in live pigs and evaluated their healing for two weeks. The five pigs that successfully completed the procedure, survived without leaks and histology indicated mucosal regeneration and fibrous tissue adhesion. This marks the first in-vivo semi-automated contactless incision closure, paving the way for automating GI surgery incision closure which has the potential to become an alternative to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.