ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-enabled energy baselines for verified building decarbonization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately quantifying energy savings in retrofitted and operational buildings remains challenging due to dynamic occupancy, weather variability, and changing operational conditions. This study proposes an AI-enabled Energy Conservation Calculation (ECC) framework to establish dynamic energy baselines and verify energy and carbon savings under real-world operation in Singapore hotel. High-resolution operational data are integrated with a hybrid LSTM-XGBoost architecture to capture temporal patterns and nonlinear interactions in building energy use, while ECC logic translates model outputs into auditable and policy-compliant savings metrics aligned with the Green Mark certification system. The framework was deployed across multiple commercial, residential, and mixed-use buildings over a three-year period. Results show consistently strong predictive performance, with root mean square error generally below 5% across heterogeneous building types. Verified outcomes indicate cumulative emissions reductions of 3221 tCO₂e and energy use intensity improvements exceeding 60% in selected retrofitted cases. Beyond performance evaluation, the framework supports closed-loop operational optimization and produces audit-ready outputs suitable for certification and sustainability-linked finance. These results show that combining dynamic AI-based baselining with standardized energy accounting enables reliable verification of decarbonization outcomes in operational buildings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.