Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

AI-enabled energy baselines for verified building decarbonization.

Junyuan Li, Yu Hao, Yuanzhe Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junyuan LiCarbon Research Institute, Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China.
Yu HaoNUS College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117575, Singapore.
Yuanzhe LiCarbon Research Institute, Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China. yuanzhe001@e.ntu.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately quantifying energy savings in retrofitted and operational buildings remains challenging due to dynamic occupancy, weather variability, and changing operational conditions. This study proposes an AI-enabled Energy Conservation Calculation (ECC) framework to establish dynamic energy baselines and verify energy and carbon savings under real-world operation in Singapore hotel. High-resolution operational data are integrated with a hybrid LSTM-XGBoost architecture to capture temporal patterns and nonlinear interactions in building energy use, while ECC logic translates model outputs into auditable and policy-compliant savings metrics aligned with the Green Mark certification system. The framework was deployed across multiple commercial, residential, and mixed-use buildings over a three-year period. Results show consistently strong predictive performance, with root mean square error generally below 5% across heterogeneous building types. Verified outcomes indicate cumulative emissions reductions of 3221 tCO₂e and energy use intensity improvements exceeding 60% in selected retrofitted cases. Beyond performance evaluation, the framework supports closed-loop operational optimization and produces audit-ready outputs suitable for certification and sustainability-linked finance. These results show that combining dynamic AI-based baselining with standardized energy accounting enables reliable verification of decarbonization outcomes in operational buildings.

Indexed as

AI-based energy modelingBuilding decarbonizationEnergy Conservation Calculation (ECC)Green Mark certificationSmart building systemsSustainability-linked finance

Identifiers

PMID41559155
PMCPMC12894995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.