ArticleScientific reports2026
High-fidelity chip delayering using green (515 nm) femtosecond lasers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately reconstructing the metal layers of semiconductor chips is essential for legacy hardware support, design validation, and failure analysis. Conventional methods such as mechanical polishing, chemical etching, and focused ion beam (FIB) delayering, while established, tend to be slow, inconsistent, and resource-intensive-making them less suitable for systematic or scalable workflows. To address these limitations, we developed a streamlined approach combining laser-based delayering with high-resolution multimodality microscopy, offering a more efficient and reproducible alternative. Building on our earlier work with infrared laser delayering, which faces challenges related to selective material interactions and uneven ablation, in this work, we have investigated the use of a green (515 nm) laser. This alternative wavelength offers reduced sensitivity to material variations, allowing for more uniform and controlled removal of chip layers. Through a thorough parameter space exploration and optimization process, we achieved significantly cleaner delayering and exposure of underlying structures. The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated through comparative imaging using confocal microscopy and SEM, as well as material analysis via EDS, all showing notable significant improvements in layer clarity and debris reduction. These results highlight the green laser's potential as a powerful tool for high-fidelity chip analysis in modern diagnostics and reverse engineering workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.