ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of drip and flood irrigated treatments under varying heat stress on winter wheat: a four-seasons experimental study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating and enhancing grain yield (GY) and water productivity (WP) is crucial for ensuring food security while reducing pressure on limited water resources through more efficient water use. This is particularly important when the adverse impacts of climate change are growing, resulting in more frequent heatwaves. However, limited research has examined the response of winter wheat GY and WP to drip and flood irrigated treatments under varying heat stress induced by interannual variation in weather. Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive crop seasons [2021-22 (season 1), 2022-23 (season 2), 2023-24 (season 3), and 2024-25 (season 4)] for winter wheat. Five irrigation treatments were employed: (i) 25% MAD (maximum allowable deficit, i.e. irrigation at 25% soil moisture depletion of total available water) with drip irrigation, (ii) 50% MAD with drip irrigation, (iii) 50% MAD with flood irrigation, (iv) farmers' field replication, and (v) rainfed treatment. Among the four seasons, the temperature and rainfall conditions varied significantly. Grain yield was analyzed using heat stress indices derived from air temperature (accumulated heat stress days, heat stress intensity & heat degree days) and observed yield (heat vulnerability index, stress tolerance index & yield stability index) to identify heat-resilient treatments that optimize water use without reducing GY. For all seasons, GY and WP values were highest for 50% MAD drip irrigation, followed by 25% MAD drip irrigation, 50% MAD flood irrigation, and farmers' field replication. In season 1, a heatwave substantially reduced GY in farmers' field replication, while soil moisture-based irrigated treatments showed greater resilience. In season 2, rainfall events during the grain-filling stage, in the absence of heat stress, led to the highest GY and WP in a specific treatment. In season 3, post-heading heat stress reduced grain yield across all treatments compared to season 2. In season 4, a hailstorm at the onset of grain-filling stage reduced yields across all irrigation treatments relative to seasons 2 and 3. Analysis of heat stress indices showed that the conventional irrigation method is more vulnerable to heat stress during critical growth stages, reducing GY. Soil moisture-based irrigation scheduling helps minimize the adverse impact of heat stress on wheat yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.