ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing unsupervised clustering of electrochemical impedance spectra via normalization and dimensionality reduction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is entering an exciting stage of development as machine learning–driven (ML) spectral analysis begins to complement traditional equivalent-circuit fitting and address some of its practical limitations. The appeal of a simple, fully data-driven, unsupervised workflow is clear: by operating directly on EIS spectra, it bypasses the additional modelling layers required for equivalent-circuit fitting, handcrafted feature extraction, or supervised training. Here we demonstrate that normalization and dimensionality reduction play a critical, yet previously overlooked, role in shaping the outcomes of unsupervised workflows. Using welded stainless steel as a demonstrator, we systematically evaluate combinations of normalization strategies and dimensionality-reduction pipelines. By applying internal clustering metrics and a Borda ranking, we identify an effective workflow configuration, an appropriate cluster number, and a cluster structure consistent with mechanistic expectations for the studied dataset. Mechanistically anchored linear projections further rank relative passivity across the stainless-steel passivity range via k-level clustering, while bootstrap resampling confirms high cluster stability despite the modest sample size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.