ArticleScientific reports2026
The sequential use of IVF disposable devices doesn't cause cumulative toxicity unless a defective device compromises the entire procedure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated whether the sequential use of disposable devices in routine IVF procedures induces cumulative embryotoxicity. Ten combinations, each including 7 to 25 disposables covering essential IVF steps-sperm collection, oocyte retrieval, fertilization, embryo culture, transfer, and freezing/thawing-were tested using the Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) in triplicate. A defined volume of culture medium was employed to extract potential toxic compounds from device associations. Both extracts and controls underwent MEA. Fresh zygotes were cultured for 120 h at 37.3 °C in a tri-gas incubator. Embryo development was monitored morphologically at E1.5, E4.0, and E5.0. At E5.0, blastocysts were fixed and analyzed for total cell counts. Of the ten tested combinations, two (20%) demonstrated toxicity, evidenced by reduced blastocyst formation and lower cell numbers at E5.0. Toxicity was attributed to specific consumables-sperm straws and embryo transfer catheters-rather than cumulative effects. Although previously certified as non-toxic, these devices were found harmful both individually and in combination. Variability in MEA protocols may explain inconsistencies in manufacturer assessments. The study concludes that sequential disposable use does not inherently cause cumulative toxicity unless a defective device intervenes, emphasizing the need for standardized preclinical MEA testing to ensure embryo safety and optimize IVF outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.