ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-scale EEG feature decoding with Swin Transformers for subject independent motor imagery BCIs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Sequence and Generative Models in Motor Imagery (MI) Classification for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High inter-subject variability and the non-stationary nature of EEG signals pose significant challenges for subject-independent Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) leading to poor model generalization. Differences in neural activity patterns, electrode placements, and external noise further degrade performance making it difficult to develop BCIs that remain reliable across users without extensive recalibration. This study presents a Compact Convolutional Swin Transformer (CCST) to address this issue by using hierarchical window based self-attention combined with convolutional feature extraction to efficiently capture both local electrode interactions and global temporal dependencies. This multi-scale feature representation enhances generalization across subjects, a critical factor for real world BCI deployment. We evaluated CCST on the BCI Competition IV (2a, 2b) and PhysioNet MI datasets using Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation achieving state-of-the-art classification accuracies of 68.27%, 76.61%, and 71.70% respectively. Our statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction confirms significant performance improvements over benchmark models. Additionally, CCST achieves a reduction in parameters and a decrease in FLOPs compared to full self-attention models making it more efficient for real-time BCI applications. These results establish CCST as a scalable and efficient framework for adaptive subject-independent BCIs with promising applications in neurorehabilitation, assistive technology, and cognitive training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.