ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Natural deep eutectic solvents as a sustainable alternative for multi-class pesticide extraction in food safety analysis.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in the Use of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Natural Product Sample Preparation: Focus on Purification, Characterization, and Sustainability.Journal of separation science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pesticide residue analysis in food is frequently carried out worldwide, often requiring a large volume of organic solvents. To improve sustainability, new generation solvents such as natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to conventional solvents. This study demonstrates the applicability of NADES as green extraction solvents for pesticides in food samples prior to analysis by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The present research goes beyond previous studies by covering an extended set of pesticide residues. For that, five hydrophilic and hydrophobic NADES were evaluated as extraction solvents in a solid-liquid extraction (SLE). Initially, eleven representative pesticides covering a broad range of chemical classes and physicochemical properties were selected, while food matrices were chosen to cover different commodity groups according to SANTE/11312/2021v2, including orange, wheat, and spinach. NADES were tailored in order to cover a wide range of physicochemical properties such as polarity, pH, and viscosity. Thymol: menthol (molar ratio, 1:1) was found to be the most effective, and key extraction parameters were optimized. The greenness and transferability of the NADES-based SLE were evaluated using the AGREEprep and BAGI metrics. Finally, the method was successfully validated for the extraction of a wide range of pesticides commonly analyzed in food safety assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.