ArticleeNeuro2026
Reliable Inference of the Encoding of Task States by Individual Neurons Using Calcium Imaging.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigations into the neural basis of behavior frequently employ calcium imaging to measure neuronal activity. Across studies, however, seemingly reasonable but highly diverse methodological choices are typically made to assess the selectivity of individual neurons to task states. Here, we examine systematically the effect of parameter choices, along the pipeline from data acquisition through statistical testing, on the inferred encoding preferences of individual neurons. We use, as an experimental testbed, calcium imaging in the medial prefrontal cortex of freely behaving mice engaged in a classic exploration-avoidance task with animal-controlled state transitions, namely, navigation in the elevated zero maze. We report that most of the key parameters in the pipeline substantially impact the inferred selectivity of neurons and do so in distinct ways. Using novel accuracy and robustness metrics, we directly compare the quality of inference across combinations of parameter levels and discover an optimal combination. We validate its optimality using resampling methods and demonstrate its generality across the two common analytical approaches used to assess neuronal selectivity-average response rate-dependent selectivity indices and continuous time-dependent regression coefficients. Together, our results not only identify an optimal parameter setting for reliably assessing encoding preferences of cortical excitatory neurons using GCaMP6f calcium imaging but also establish a general data-driven procedure for identifying such optimal settings for other cell types, brain areas, and tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.