ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
Retention in opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy and variations according to treatment and maternal characteristics.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in Opioid Agonist Treatment for Opioid Dependence During Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study in New South Wales 2005-2021.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsTo measure the proportion of women in New South Wales, Australia, retained in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid dependence (OD) during pregnancy and examine how this varies according to treatment and maternal characteristics.
designRetrospective cohort study using linked population-based data, including OAT records, perinatal, hospital admissions, mental health outpatient services and criminal justice data.
settingNew South Wales, Australia, January 2004-December 2021.
participantsPregnancies resulting in childbirth among women receiving OAT during pregnancy. The cohort included 4472 pregnancies among 2821 women receiving OAT during pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS: We defined retention as continuous receipt of OAT from the date of OAT initiation during pregnancy or date of conception (whichever came last) until childbirth. We calculated the proportion of women retained in treatment and 95% confidence intervals (CI) overall, by timing of initiation (pre-conception, first, second and third trimester) and medication type (methadone, buprenorphine) at initiation. We used logistic regression to assess retention variation according to maternal socio-demographic and clinical factors, including morbidities commonly co-occurring with OD, stratified by timing of initiation. Data on dosing, other substance use and psychopharmacological medications were unavailable.
findingsOAT was initiated pre-conception in 74.8% (3346) of pregnancies, during the first trimester in 11.1% (n = 497), second trimester in 8.8% (n = 394) and third trimester in 5.3% (n = 237). Overall, women were retained in OAT for 84.3% (3771) of all pregnancies. Retention was 87.4% (95% CI = 86.3-88.6) with pre-conception initiation; 65.8% (95% CI = 61.6-70.0) in the first trimester; 80.5% (95% CI = 76.5-84.4) second trimester; and 85.2% (95% CI = 80.8-89.7) third trimester. Retention was 72.4% (95% CI = 69.5-75.3) with buprenorphine and 87.7% (95% CI = 86.6-88.9) with methadone. Pregnancies delivered during 2019-2021 were less likely to be retained in treatment compared with those delivered during 2004-2006, regardless of the timing of initiation [pre-conception initiation odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.30-0.79; first trimester initiation OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.08-1.07; second/third trimester initiation OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.10-0.91). Among women who initiated OAT pre-conception, retention was lower among those whose first antenatal visit occurred after 20 gestational weeks (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53-0.86), those in their first (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54-0.97) or second pregnancy (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.56-0.96) and those who initiated on buprenorphine (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.24-0.40) or in a custodial setting (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-1.01).
conclusionsIn New South Wales, Australia, from 2004 to 2021, over 84% of women receiving opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy were retained in treatment until childbirth; however, lower retention in later study years and among women initiating buprenorphine, coupled with recent guidelines recommending buprenorphine as first-line therapy during pregnancy, highlights the need for ongoing monitoring and targeted support to improve retention among women who are at higher risk of discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.