Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41558849›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Retention in opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy and variations according to treatment and maternal characteristics.

Bianca Varney, Nicola Jones, Chrianna Bharat, Jonathan Brett, Louisa Degenhardt, Ju-Lee Oei, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Alys Havard, Duong T Tran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bianca VarneyNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-6018
Nicola JonesNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Chrianna BharatNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-0386
Jonathan BrettMedicines Intelligence Research Program, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-7495
Louisa DegenhardtNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-2218
Ju-Lee OeiDepartment of Newborn Care, The Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-3771
Sallie-Anne PearsonMedicines Intelligence Research Program, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Alys HavardNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6563-8804
Duong T TranNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

TRANSFORM - Transforming the evidence base on estimating prevalence of opioid use disorder and expanded access to interventions to prevent drug related deaths: an international data linkage studyR01DA059822 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · PI Joshua Adam Barocas, Louisa Degenhardt · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
Using existing data to understand and ameliorate risk in opioid agonist therapyR01DA044170 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · PI DEGENHARDT, LOUISA · 2017 to 2019
$641k
Australian Government Department of Health under the Drug and Alcohol ProgramAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Research Investigator 2016825National Drug and Alcohol Research CentreNational Institute of Health R01 DA144740NHMRC ASCEND programme 1150078NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Medicines Intelligence 1196900NHMRC Ideas grant 2010778NHMRC Investigator Grant 1196560NHMRC Research Fellowship 1135991NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044170NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059822UNSW Neuroscience, Mental Health and Addiction Theme 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTo measure the proportion of women in New South Wales, Australia, retained in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid dependence (OD) during pregnancy and examine how this varies according to treatment and maternal characteristics.

designRetrospective cohort study using linked population-based data, including OAT records, perinatal, hospital admissions, mental health outpatient services and criminal justice data.

settingNew South Wales, Australia, January 2004-December 2021.

participantsPregnancies resulting in childbirth among women receiving OAT during pregnancy. The cohort included 4472 pregnancies among 2821 women receiving OAT during pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS: We defined retention as continuous receipt of OAT from the date of OAT initiation during pregnancy or date of conception (whichever came last) until childbirth. We calculated the proportion of women retained in treatment and 95% confidence intervals (CI) overall, by timing of initiation (pre-conception, first, second and third trimester) and medication type (methadone, buprenorphine) at initiation. We used logistic regression to assess retention variation according to maternal socio-demographic and clinical factors, including morbidities commonly co-occurring with OD, stratified by timing of initiation. Data on dosing, other substance use and psychopharmacological medications were unavailable.

findingsOAT was initiated pre-conception in 74.8% (3346) of pregnancies, during the first trimester in 11.1% (n = 497), second trimester in 8.8% (n = 394) and third trimester in 5.3% (n = 237). Overall, women were retained in OAT for 84.3% (3771) of all pregnancies. Retention was 87.4% (95% CI = 86.3-88.6) with pre-conception initiation; 65.8% (95% CI = 61.6-70.0) in the first trimester; 80.5% (95% CI = 76.5-84.4) second trimester; and 85.2% (95% CI = 80.8-89.7) third trimester. Retention was 72.4% (95% CI = 69.5-75.3) with buprenorphine and 87.7% (95% CI = 86.6-88.9) with methadone. Pregnancies delivered during 2019-2021 were less likely to be retained in treatment compared with those delivered during 2004-2006, regardless of the timing of initiation [pre-conception initiation odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.30-0.79; first trimester initiation OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.08-1.07; second/third trimester initiation OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.10-0.91). Among women who initiated OAT pre-conception, retention was lower among those whose first antenatal visit occurred after 20 gestational weeks (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53-0.86), those in their first (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54-0.97) or second pregnancy (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.56-0.96) and those who initiated on buprenorphine (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.24-0.40) or in a custodial setting (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-1.01).

conclusionsIn New South Wales, Australia, from 2004 to 2021, over 84% of women receiving opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy were retained in treatment until childbirth; however, lower retention in later study years and among women initiating buprenorphine, coupled with recent guidelines recommending buprenorphine as first-line therapy during pregnancy, highlights the need for ongoing monitoring and targeted support to improve retention among women who are at higher risk of discontinuation.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMethadoneNew South WalesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadonemethadone and buprenorphineopioid agonist treatmentopioid dependencepopulation‐based cohort studypregnancytreatment retention

Identifiers

PMID41558849
PMCPMC13111792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.