ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2026
National access to renal transplantation and post-transplant survival among patients with diabetes: deceased and living donor outcomes.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the USA, patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease are less likely to undergo deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) or living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). We explored the survival benefit of DDKT and LDKT among patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe used the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file to identify adults placed on the kidney waiting list between January 2014 and January 2024. Waitlist failure was evaluated with Fine and Gray analysis; life-years from transplant, equal survival (ES), and equal risk (ER) were extrapolated using lognormal survival regression; and life-years gained was quantified via restricted mean survival over 10 years.
resultsPatients with diabetes were more likely to experience 10-year waitlist failure (subdistribution HR 2.27, 95% CI 2.23 to 2.32) and receive inferior DDKT grafts (Kidney Donor Profile Index 49% vs 35%, p<0.001) compared with patients without diabetes. For patients with diabetes, LDKT, compared with DDKT, offered more life-years from transplant (18.2 years vs 14.1 years), resulted in more life-years gained (29% vs 24% relative increase over 10 years, p<0.001) and decreased ES by 19 months and ER by 30 months.
conclusionsProceeding to transplantation offers significant survival benefit for end-stage renal disease patients with diabetes, with LDKT offering superior survival compared with DDKT. By reducing time on the waiting list and providing superior grafts, the benefit of LDKT is particularly enhanced among patients with diabetes, and targeted efforts should be made to expand living donor access for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.