SynthesisBMJ global health2026
Effectiveness of domestic food hygiene interventions on the microbiological quality of child food and childhood diarrhoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoodborne diseases are an important cause of global morbidity and mortality, particularly among children who often experience diarrhoeal illnesses linked to foodborne enteric infections. Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce diarrhoea remains limited. This review synthesised evidence on the effectiveness of domestic food hygiene interventions on microbiological quality of child food and diarrhoea in children under five. METHODS AND
findingsNine databases were searched, with screening and reviewing conducted independently by two reviewers. Eligible study designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that clearly described a food hygiene intervention and included a concurrent control. Primary outcomes were the microbiological quality of child food and childhood diarrhoea. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Of the 15 586 records identified, 11 were included. Three of four studies that assessed food contamination outcomes reported evidence of reduction in
conclusionsResults suggest that standalone domestic food hygiene interventions can improve microbial food quality and reduce childhood diarrhoea. However, these interventions were not effective when integrated into broader packages with WASH, nutrition or childhood development. These findings underscore the importance of dedicated food hygiene interventions for improving child health outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022336954.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.