ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
Head-Mounted Cameras in Virtual Clinical Learning.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Head-Mounted Cameras in Virtual Clinical Learning.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical workplace learning was severely disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic because of social distancing measures. In response, we developed a Virtual Clinic using head-mounted cameras to preserve authentic patient contact and clinical team interaction for medical students. Our aim was to create virtual teaching activities that allowed participation in real-time patient care and facilitated peer learning and feedback. APPROACH: The Virtual Clinic was established in a separate space with live video connections to the hospital ward. Students rotated between wearing head-mounted cameras during rounds, teaching visits and consultations, whereas peers observed remotely in small groups. Educational design was informed by principles of authentic and active learning strategies. Remote students contributed through discussion, documentation tasks and peer feedback. EVALUATION: Twenty-seven medical students participated in the Virtual Clinic during their internal medicine clerkship. Data were collected through 37 Likert-scale items and 13 open-ended questions. Students reported that Virtual Patient Rounds and Virtual Teaching Visits were both engaging and intellectually stimulating. Despite remote engagement, students reported a strong sense of integration within the medical team. Limitations included occasional connectivity issues. IMPLICATIONS: This innovation supported continued clinical education during pandemic restrictions while fostering student autonomy and team integration. The approach is transferable to other disciplines and contexts, such as interprofessional or global health education. Key lessons include the potential for virtual bedside learning beyond COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.