Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41558732›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2026

Head-Mounted Cameras in Virtual Clinical Learning.

Tessa A Mulder, Soufian Meziyerh, Argho Ray, Arianne D Pieterse, Johannes W de Fijter, Peter G M de Jong, Floris M van Blankenstein, Esther C Hamoen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tessa A MulderDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9606-8007
Soufian MeziyerhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-8381
Argho RayDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arianne D PieterseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johannes W de FijterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Peter G M de JongCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9038-3137
Floris M van BlankensteinCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Esther C HamoenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical workplace learning was severely disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic because of social distancing measures. In response, we developed a Virtual Clinic using head-mounted cameras to preserve authentic patient contact and clinical team interaction for medical students. Our aim was to create virtual teaching activities that allowed participation in real-time patient care and facilitated peer learning and feedback. APPROACH: The Virtual Clinic was established in a separate space with live video connections to the hospital ward. Students rotated between wearing head-mounted cameras during rounds, teaching visits and consultations, whereas peers observed remotely in small groups. Educational design was informed by principles of authentic and active learning strategies. Remote students contributed through discussion, documentation tasks and peer feedback. EVALUATION: Twenty-seven medical students participated in the Virtual Clinic during their internal medicine clerkship. Data were collected through 37 Likert-scale items and 13 open-ended questions. Students reported that Virtual Patient Rounds and Virtual Teaching Visits were both engaging and intellectually stimulating. Despite remote engagement, students reported a strong sense of integration within the medical team. Limitations included occasional connectivity issues. IMPLICATIONS: This innovation supported continued clinical education during pandemic restrictions while fostering student autonomy and team integration. The approach is transferable to other disciplines and contexts, such as interprofessional or global health education. Key lessons include the potential for virtual bedside learning beyond COVID-19.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceStudents, MedicalTeaching RoundsVideo RecordingWearable Electronic DevicesCOVID-19HeadHumansInternal MedicinePandemicsProblem-Based LearningRemote Consultation

Identifiers

PMID41558732
PMCPMC12818967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.