Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41558661›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie2026

Artificial Intelligence Competencies and Educational Needs Among ERNICA Members: Results of a Multinational Survey.

Holger Till, Hesham Elsayed, Beate Obermüller, Richard Gnatzy, Martin Lacher, Sebastian Tschauner, Rosa Verhoeven, Rene M H Wijnen, Georg Singer, ERNICA AI Task Force Members

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Holger TillDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Hesham ElsayedDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Beate ObermüllerDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Richard GnatzyDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin LacherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian TschaunerDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Rosa VerhoevenDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rene M H WijnenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Georg SingerDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4770-3144
ERNICA AI Task Force Members

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative force in healthcare. In the field of rare diseases, AI can enhance diagnostic accuracy and facilitate knowledge-sharing across borders. To effectively contribute to the development and use of AI-based medical support systems, clinicians must provide specialized AI competencies. This survey assesses the AI readiness, educational needs, and perceptions of members within the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA). Methods: A structured online survey consisting of 22 questions was distributed to 389 ERNICA members, collecting data on demographics, AI awareness, current use, educational needs, concerns, and future expectations. Results: A total of 89 members responded (23%), representing a multidisciplinary group with varying experience. Most respondents (94%) reported no formal AI training yet, and rated their AI knowledge as basic (66%) or intermediate (26%). About 48% of the participants stated using AI applications already. Key educational needs included online courses and webinars. Major concerns focused on the reliability and accuracy of AI tools (80%) and ethical implications (71%). At the same time, 55% expect ERNICA to take a leading role in AI education in the diagnosis and management of rare gastrointestinal diseases. Conclusion: This survey among ERNICA members revealed a definite gap of AI understanding and training. Addressing these issues requires tailored educational initiatives focused on practical AI applications, ethical considerations, and interpretability. By adopting a proactive role in AI capacity-building, ERNICA could contribute to responsible and effective integration of AI into rare disease care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCongenital AbnormalitiesRare DiseasesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41558661
PMCPMC13375283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.