ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
The Impact of Community-Based Midwife Continuity of Care Models for Women Living in Areas of Social Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity in the United Kingdom: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Ethnicity and Migration in Perinatal Inequalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Community-Based Midwife Continuity of Care Models for Women Living in Areas of Social Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity in the United Kingdom: A Prospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- The role of poverty-related social determinants in maternal and perinatal health inequities: a cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR born in South London, UK maternity-child data linkage.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAddressing inequalities in maternal and newborn health is a UK public health priority. Evidence on effective multi-interventional strategies is urgently needed. This study evaluated the impact of community-based midwife continuity of care (CBMCOC) models for women and babies in ethnically diverse and socially disadvantaged areas of South London.
designWe conducted a prospective cohort study using the eLIXIR, Born in South London, maternity-child data linkage.
settingUnited Kingdom. POPULATION: Pregnant women exposed to CBMCOC and standard care between 2018 and 2020.
methodsPropensity score matching (1:4) was used to account for differences between CBMCOC and standard care cohorts and control for confounding bias. Conditional logistic regression estimated risk ratios. Subgroup analysis included women of Black, Asian and other ethnic minority groups, and those living in highly deprived areas. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was preterm birth (< 37 weeks' gestation). Secondary outcomes included other relevant maternal, perinatal, process and clinical variables.
resultsBefore matching, 12 386 women were exposed to standard care and 1338 to CBMCOC; after matching, 5352 and 1338 were included, respectively. The risk of preterm birth was lower among women exposed to CBMCOC (unmatched: 4.6% vs. 10.3%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.64; matched: 4.6% vs. 8.4%, RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.70). Subgroup analyses showed reduced preterm birth rates among ethnic minority women and those in deprived areas when exposed to CBMCOC.
conclusionsIn this diverse population with a range of risk factors, locality-based interventions integrating community-based care and midwife continuity may reduce maternal and newborn health inequalities. Further trials of such models should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.