ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-enhanced routine CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLumbar CT and MRI scans are helpful for osteoporosis (OP) screening. Deep learning enhances the efficiency and accuracy of musculoskeletal quantification for OP screening.
objectivesTo develop a deep learning-based model (UNet3D) for musculoskeletal quantification from lumbar CT and MRI in OP patients, and to explore musculoskeletal relationship. MATERIALS: Retrospectively analyzing OP patients' lumbar CT, MRI and DXA scans between January 2018 and August 2025 from two center, and UNet3D was developed based on U-Net to simultaneously segment L1-S1 vertebrae on CT and paraspinal muscles/intermuscular spaces on MRI. Performance was compared against U-Net, U
resultsThe study analyzed 410 OP patients (65 ± 10 years; 240 women) with 76,700 axial CT and 6210 axial T2 slices, including training (266), validation (76), internal test (38) and external test (30) sets. On the internal test set, UNet3D's accuracy in CT (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.984/0.849/0.760) and MRI (PA/mPA/mIoU, 0.973/0.849/0.724), outperformed U-Net/U
conclusionUNet3D outperformed U-Net/U
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.