ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2026
The Relationship between Social Vulnerability Index, Area Deprivation Index, and Child Opportunity Index, and Treatment Course Characteristics in Infants with Surgically Intervenable Congenital Anomalies.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The social vulnerability index (SVI) is a place-based index used to stratify community risk. We evaluated the impact of SVI on pregnancy and infant outcomes in patients with surgically treatable congenital anomalies. Study Design: This is a retrospective study of pregnant patients and infant dyads diagnosed from 2014 to 2022 with congenital anomalies amenable to surgical treatment. Dyads were grouped into SVI quartiles. Primary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality, and secondary outcomes included prenatal care services, pregnancy course characteristics, and pregnant person co-morbidities. The area deprivation index and child opportunity index were also collected. Bivariate comparisons of patient characteristics and unadjusted odds ratios for death or morbidity stratified by SVI quartile were performed. Results: Two hundred and ninety-five dyads met the inclusion criteria. Ten point two percent had low SVI, 23.7% low-medium, 35.3% medium-high, and 30.9% high. The only prenatal care service associated with SVI quartile was fetal MRI ( Conclusion: SVI quartile was not associated with infant outcomes in patients with surgically treatable congenital anomalies. Future studies should examine the impact of SVI or other indices of social vulnerability on perinatal and long-term postnatal outcomes in these high-risk patients. Key Points: · Healthcare inequities warrant exploration in congenital surgical pathologies.. · Explored SVI quartile association with infant outcomes.. · Primary outcomes were not associated with SVI quartile.. · Nonsignificantly higher odds of poor outcome in patients with high SVI quartile..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.