ArticleOral oncology2026
Accuracy of frozen section for HPV-Associated squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary.
Article in Oral oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCurrent guidelines for the management of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) recommend submission of suspicious primary sites for frozen section analysis (FSA). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FSA for identification of HPV-associated SCCUP.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven p16-positive SCCUP who underwent diagnostic operation at two tertiary care institutions was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of diagnostic FSA were assessed.
results77 patients were included in analysis. 66 patients underwent definitive TORS (diagnostic TORS operation with subsequent neck dissection after identification of the occult primary tumor), 7 patients underwent diagnostic TORS (TORS to identify occult primary tumor, no neck dissection), and 4 patients underwent direct laryngoscopy and biopsy only. Primary tumors were identified in 63 patients (82%) with a mean tumor size of 1.1 cm. There was no significant difference in size between patients whose tumor was identified on FSA (mean 1.1 cm) and on permanent only (mean 0.9 cm) (p = 0.26). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FSA for SCCUP was 86%, 100%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. Diagnostic frozen specimens included 52 direct laryngoscopy biopsies and 69 TORS excisions. In the biopsies, sensitivity was 100% and NPV was 100%, whereas in the TORS-excised specimens, sensitivity was 77% and NPV was 77%.
conclusionsIn this case series of 77 patients with SCCUP, the sensitivity and NPV of FSA for identification of the primary tumor was over 85%. FSA is valuable during diagnostic operation for SCCUP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.