Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41558024›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Quantifying Innovation in Stroke: Large Language Model Bibliometric Analysis.

Adam Marcus, Georgina Lockwood-Taylor, Daniel Rueckert, Paul Bentley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam MarcusDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-4549
Georgina Lockwood-TaylorDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2138-438X
Daniel RueckertDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-5889
Paul BentleyDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8036-7010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy represent the most successful stroke innovations over the last 30 years. Quantifying innovation in stroke is essential for identifying productive research lines and prioritizing funding, but health care lacks validated methods for measuring innovation.

objectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate the relationship between stroke-related patents and publications, demonstrate the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) in this process, and identify the most rapidly advancing innovations in stroke care by mapping them to a theoretical innovation life cycle.

methodsThe Open Patent Services (European Patent Office) and PubMed databases were searched between 1993 and 2023 for "stroke OR cerebrovascular." In this bibliometric patent-publication analysis, a 13 billion-parameter Llama LLM was trained to identify patents related to stroke disease, as opposed to other references to the word "stroke," on a manually labeled subset of 5000 patents and assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. The LLM filtered irrelevant results, and the resulting patent codes were grouped into innovation clusters. For each cluster, annual patent and publication counts were normalized to adjust for global trends. Cluster-specific growth curves were plotted to analyze the rates and characteristics of growth. The innovation life cycle stage for each innovation cluster was estimated by fitting a sigmoid curve to the patent and publication data consistent with the diffusion of innovations theory by Rogers.

resultsThe cross-validated accuracy of the LLM was 99.2%, with a sensitivity of 96.5% and a specificity of 99.6%. An initial bibliometric search retrieved 237,035 patents and 486,664 research publications. A manual review of a random sample of patents before filtering revealed that only 11.2% (56/500) were relevant to stroke. After LLM filtering, of the 237,035 patents, 28,225 (11.9%) stroke-related patents remained. These were grouped into 7 innovation clusters: pharmacological treatment, alternative medicine, rehabilitation devices, medical imaging, diagnostic testing, surgical devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Patent and publication counts were strongly correlated across clusters (Spearman r

conclusionsApplying an LLM to publicly available patent and publication data provides a scalable way to quantify innovation in stroke. Pharmacological treatment appears to have entered a saturation phase, whereas AI methods, rehabilitation devices, and medical imaging remain in rapid growth, highlighting areas of greatest traction for future research and investment.

Indexed as

BibliometricsStrokeHumansLarge Language ModelsPatents as TopicAIartificial intelligencediffusion of innovationinnovationlarge language modelstroke

Identifiers

PMID41558024
PMCPMC12869152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.