Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557875›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Prevalence of Bodily Distress Syndrome and Prediction of Patient Outcomes: Cohort Study of 3762 Individuals With Persistent Pain.

Live Landmark, Hans Fredrik Sunde, Egil A Fors, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Silje Endresen Reme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Live LandmarkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8531-3539
Hans Fredrik SundeThe Mind-Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-5422
Egil A ForsDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0980-8247
Leif Edward Ottesen KennairDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-7096
Silje Endresen RemeThe Mind-Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-4906

Funding

Municipalities in Viken, NorwayThe Mind-Body Lab, University of OsloThe Research Council of NorwayThe Research Council of Norway through its Centers of Excellence 262700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent physical symptoms are common and often result in disability and high healthcare use. To capture how such symptoms co-occur, Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS, also called Functional Somatic Disorders) was developed as an empirically derived construct, in contrast to consensus-based syndromes such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). BDS is distinct from ICD-11 Bodily Distress Disorder and reflects the multisystem symptom pattern described in the Functional Somatic Disorder framework. However, its prevalence, symptom structure and prognostic relevance in pain populations have not been mapped.

methodsThis study included 3762 individuals referred to a tertiary pain clinic. At baseline, participants reported standardised measures of fatigue, insomnia, pain catastrophizing, psychological distress, perceived injustice, health-related quality of life and disability. After 12 months, they reported disability and perceived change. BDS severity was classified from predefined symptom cluster criteria. We examined prevalence, clinical correlates and prognostic utility.

results92.5% met the criteria for moderate or severe BDS. They reported more severe physical symptoms, elevated psychological distress and reduced functioning than those not meeting the criteria. Severe BDS was more common among women, those without higher education and individuals outside the workforce. After 12 months, individuals with BDS showed less improvement in functioning and reported lower perceived treatment benefit.

conclusionBDS was common in this outpatient hospital cohort and may offer a clinically useful lens for capturing multisystem complexity in specialised pain services. Incorporating BDS screening into routine assessment could help identify individuals with complex symptoms and support more mechanism-oriented treatment approaches. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS) is highly prevalent in tertiary pain care and linked to more severe symptoms, psychosocial burden and poorer long-term outcomes. The findings support BDS as a clinically useful framework for identifying patients with complex symptom profiles and for guiding interdisciplinary, mechanism-oriented approaches to pain management.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSomatoform DisordersAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisPsychological DistressQuality of LifeSymptom Burden

Identifiers

PMID41557875
PMCPMC12818827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.