ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Prevalence of Bodily Distress Syndrome and Prediction of Patient Outcomes: Cohort Study of 3762 Individuals With Persistent Pain.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Bodily Distress Syndrome and Prediction of Patient Outcomes: Cohort Study of 3762 Individuals With Persistent Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent physical symptoms are common and often result in disability and high healthcare use. To capture how such symptoms co-occur, Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS, also called Functional Somatic Disorders) was developed as an empirically derived construct, in contrast to consensus-based syndromes such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). BDS is distinct from ICD-11 Bodily Distress Disorder and reflects the multisystem symptom pattern described in the Functional Somatic Disorder framework. However, its prevalence, symptom structure and prognostic relevance in pain populations have not been mapped.
methodsThis study included 3762 individuals referred to a tertiary pain clinic. At baseline, participants reported standardised measures of fatigue, insomnia, pain catastrophizing, psychological distress, perceived injustice, health-related quality of life and disability. After 12 months, they reported disability and perceived change. BDS severity was classified from predefined symptom cluster criteria. We examined prevalence, clinical correlates and prognostic utility.
results92.5% met the criteria for moderate or severe BDS. They reported more severe physical symptoms, elevated psychological distress and reduced functioning than those not meeting the criteria. Severe BDS was more common among women, those without higher education and individuals outside the workforce. After 12 months, individuals with BDS showed less improvement in functioning and reported lower perceived treatment benefit.
conclusionBDS was common in this outpatient hospital cohort and may offer a clinically useful lens for capturing multisystem complexity in specialised pain services. Incorporating BDS screening into routine assessment could help identify individuals with complex symptoms and support more mechanism-oriented treatment approaches. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS) is highly prevalent in tertiary pain care and linked to more severe symptoms, psychosocial burden and poorer long-term outcomes. The findings support BDS as a clinically useful framework for identifying patients with complex symptom profiles and for guiding interdisciplinary, mechanism-oriented approaches to pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.