Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557796›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

ER membrane receptors engage core autophagy machinery to initiate ER-phagy.

Cha Wu, Haixia Yang, Chen Wang, Peiqi Huang, Ning Yan, Ruobing Ren, Wei Liu, Yi Lu, Chunmei Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regulation and roles of mammalian mitophagy.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Dual regulation of autophagy: paradoxical effects on tumor angiogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cha Wu *State Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0009-0007-5495-5258
Haixia Yang *State Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Chen WangState Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Peiqi HuangState Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Ning YanState Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Ruobing RenState Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-7216
Wei LiuCenter for Metabolism Research, International Institutes of Medicine, International School of Medicine and the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Yiwu 322000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-4718
Yi LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1599-8593
Chunmei ChangState Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5607-7985

Funding

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 32270745MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 32270795MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 32470791Shanghai Municipal Health Commission () 2022YQ067STCSM | Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality () 23ZR1466500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) phagy is the form of selective autophagy that governs ER abundance and integrity by targeting dysfunctional ER fragments for degradation. How the recognition of ER fragments as autophagy substrates is coupled to engagement of the core autophagic machinery is largely unknown. Here, using a combination of in vitro reconstitution systems, structural modeling, and cell biology, we demonstrate that ER membrane receptors directly engage the core autophagy component ATG9A, as well as the PI3P-binding protein WIPI2, to initiate ER-associated autophagosome biogenesis. ER-phagy receptor-ATG9A association nucleates the recruitment of the other key autophagy proteins required to initiate ER-phagy. In parallel, ER-phagy receptor-WIPI2 engagement promotes rapid LC3 lipidation for autophagic membrane expansion. These data show how ER-phagy receptors trigger the cascade of events leading to ER autophagosome formation.

Indexed as

AutophagosomesAutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumMembrane ProteinsVesicular Transport ProteinsAnimalsHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsATG9A protein, humanAutophagy-Related ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteinsautophagosome biogenesisautophagy machineryER-phagyER-phagy receptorin vitro reconstitution

Identifiers

PMID41557796
PMCPMC12846783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.