Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557727›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A wavelet-based approach generates quantitative, scale-free and hierarchical descriptions of 3D genome structures and new biological insights.

Ryan Pellow, Josep M Comeron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan PellowDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Josep M ComeronDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-6437

Funding

Genetic and environmental factors affecting alternative lengthening of telomeresR01AG081263 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Josep M Comeron, Anna L Malkova · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are organized within nuclei in three-dimensional space, forming structures such as loops, topologically associating domains (TADs), and chromosome territories. This 3D architecture impacts gene regulation and development, stress responses, and disease. However, current methods to infer these 3D structures from genomic data have multiple drawbacks, including varying outcomes depending on the resolution of the analysis and sequencing depth, qualitative outputs that limit statistical comparisons, and insufficient insight into structure frequency within samples. These challenges hinder rigorous comparisons of 3D properties across genomes, conditions, or species. To overcome these issues, we developed WaveTAD, a wavelet transform-based method that provides a resolution-free, probabilistic, and hierarchical description of 3D organization. WaveTAD generates TAD strengths, capturing the variable frequency of intrachromosomal interactions within samples, and shows increased accuracy and sensitivity over existing methods. We applied WaveTAD to multiple datasets from Drosophila, mouse, and humans to illustrate new biological insights that our more sensitive and quantitative approach provides, such as the widespread presence of embryonic 3D organization before zygotic genome activation, the effect of multiple CTCF units on the stability of loops and TADs, and the association between gene expression and TAD structures in COVID-19 patients or sex-specific transcription in Drosophila.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsWavelet AnalysisAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophilaHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID41557727
PMCPMC12829961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.