Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557713›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Improving micromorphological analysis with CNN-based segmentation of flint/obsidian, bone and charcoal.

Rafael Arnay, Pedro García-Villa, Javier Hernández-Aceituno, Sara Rueda-Saiz, Carolina Mallol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael ArnayDepartment of Computer Engineering and Systems, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Pedro García-VillaArchaeological Micromorphology and Biomarker Research Lab, Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González (IUBO), La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7885-3018
Javier Hernández-AceitunoDepartment of Computer Engineering and Systems, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-0605
Sara Rueda-SaizArchaeological Micromorphology and Biomarker Research Lab, Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González (IUBO), La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8265-1731
Carolina MallolArchaeological Micromorphology and Biomarker Research Lab, Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica Antonio González (IUBO), La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantification and identification of components in archaeological micromorphology remain subjective and challenging, particularly for early-career researchers. To address this, we developed a deep learning tool for the automatic segmentation of three materials commonly found in Palaeolithic contexts and thin sections: bone, charcoal, and lithic fine-grained debitage (flint and obsidian). Using high-resolution photomicrographs of 57 thin sections in plane-polarised and cross-polarised light, we trained and evaluated state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for material segmentation. The best-performing configuration, a U-Net with an InceptionV4 encoder, achieved mean intersection over union (IoU) scores of 0.96 for flint/obsidian, 0.80 for bone, and 0.82 for charcoal. The models also classified the relative abundance of each material with balanced accuracies of 0.99 for flint/obsidian, 0.92 for bone, and 0.85 for charcoal. These results demonstrate the potential of deep learning to enhance objectivity, accuracy, and reproducibility in archaeological micromorphology, providing a valuable resource for future geoarchaeological research.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBone and BonesCharcoalAnimalsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFossilsNeural Networks, ComputerCharcoal

Identifiers

PMID41557713
PMCPMC12818656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.