ArticlePloS one2026
Pneumonia and pneumothorax detection: A multi-factor evaluation of chest X-rays.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research creates a Vision Transformer (ViT) diagnostic system which identifies pneumonia and pneumothorax from chest radiographs through analysis of the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset. The research methodology solves medical imaging problems through three essential components which include (i) radiograph-specific augmentation for simulating authentic imaging conditions and (ii) multi-label imbalance handling through WeightedRandomSampler with class-specific weight application to stop all-normal predictions and (iii) optimization improvements that include CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts scheduling and sigmoid-based classification head optimization and disease-specific threshold optimization. The evaluation of model performance uses AUC and sensitivity and specificity and precision and F1-score because accuracy proves ineffective when dealing with severe class imbalances. The ViT models achieve 70-75% accuracy and 0.63-0.71 AUC values for both target conditions during non-leaking and noise-aware experiments because of the weak labels and restricted supervision in the ChestX-ray14 dataset. The system enhances its ability to detect rare conditions while providing better interpretability through Vision Transformer attention-based visualization of important radiological areas. The research demonstrates that ViT performance improves significantly through medical-focused data preparation methods and training approaches which demonstrate potential for radiology assistance in high-volume and resource-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.