ArticlePloS one2026
Pregnancy and epileptic seizures in the emergency department setting: A retrospective analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the clinical features, management, and outcomes of pregnant women with generalized tonic-clonic seizures presenting to the emergency department (ED). The aim was to demonstrate how patients' clinical features contribute to patient management and prognosis.
methodsIn this retrospective study, pregnant women over the age of 18 who presented to the ED with generalized tonic-clonic seizures were included. The patients' demographic characteristics, clinical findings, treatments administered in the ED, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics, the chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U or t-test for continuous variables were used in the statistical analysis.
resultsThe study included 48 patients, most of whom were in their third trimester. Thirty-three (69%) patients had a history of epilepsy, and 28 (58.3%) were using antiseizure medications (ASMs). The most commonly used ASM was levetiracetam. Seven (14.6%) patients had suspected eclampsia, and seizure control was achieved in four of them by administering ASMs in addition to magnesium sulfate treatment. Two (4.2%) patients developed status epilepticus (SE). A significant relationship was observed between gestational age and hospitalization (p = 0.005).
conclusionThe diagnostic complexity of epileptic seizures in pregnancy complicates treatment choices, and ASM use may also be beneficial in managing eclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.