ArticlePloS one2026
Academic stress through salivary biomarkers: A multivariate exploration of cortisol, IL-1β, CRP, and IgA levels with sex-specific insights.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic stress activates physiological responses mediated by the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to the release of biomarkers such as cortisol and proinflammatory cytokines. While stress physiology has been extensively studied in clinical populations, few studies have systematically examined the association between academic stress and multiple salivary biomarkers in undergraduates, particularly with attention to sex differences. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between self-reported academic stress survey measured via the SISCO inventory and four salivary biomarkers of cellular inflammation: cortisol, interleukin-1β, C-reactive protein, and immunoglobulin A in 81 undergraduates (53 females, 28 males). Biomarker levels were quantified using ELISA, and data were analyzed via multivariate approaches (ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and linear regression modeling). Participants were categorized as low (37%), moderate (35%), and high (28%) stress levels based on SISCO scores. Although no statistically significant associations were found between SISCO scores and individual biomarkers, multivariate analysis revealed a predictive model (R² = 0.14) combining all four biomarkers, with stress level predictions within ±20% of observed values. Males in the high-stress score showed lower cortisol trends but higher proinflammatory markers compared to females, suggesting divergent physiological stress responses by sex. These findings provide preliminary evidence for sex-differential association in self-reported academic stress with biological markers of inflammation, highlighting the potential of biomarker panels rather than single markers to capture the complexity of academic stress. In addition, this study establishes a methodological framework for combining psychometric tools with multi-biomarker analyses in stress research, addressing a critical gap in the literature on academic stress physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.