ArticlePloS one2026
Drawing cancer chronicles: A qualitative study to evaluate narrative meaning-making over time and in response to a meaning-centred care intervention.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of incurable cancer can disrupt life stories, undermining meaning-making and challenging self-identity. People may therefore need to search for and create new stories about their lives that incorporate their diagnosis. Arts-based narrative interventions are being explored to support this existential process of narrative meaning-making. However, developing effective existential support may be limited by the lack of methods capable of investigating their impact. This study is the first to explore narrative meaning-making across time and a meaning-centred care intervention by longitudinally using 'Rich Pictures' (RPs) - hand-drawn visual narratives. We analysed repeated RPs about living with incurable cancer from thirty-eight participants in two studies: one incorporating an arts-based narrative intervention, and one without. RPs were compared across time and the two groups using an inductive, multi-level, and participatory analysis approach. Our findings highlighted six strategies variably used by participants to reconstruct their narratives over time: repeating, retaining, repurposing, reinforcing, reducing, and reassembling. Differences were found in the employment of these strategies between the two different studies, with arts-based intervention participants predominantly developing new ways of narrating and relating to cancer as a disruptive life event. We conclude that people living with incurable cancer employ a range of strategies in reconstructing their narratives. Arts-based interventions may support this existential process. The repeated use of RPs is a valuable method for investigating narrative meaning-making over time, across groups, and interventions, offering insights to evaluate and develop meaning-centred care in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.