ArticlePloS one2026
Forest fire prediction using image processing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest fires pose a significant threat to public safety and the environment, and harmful pollutants spread rapidly in areas covered by vegetation. Early detection is very important for preventing forest fires from evolving into catastrophic fires. The traditional prediction methods have relatively low accuracy. They can only identify fires clearly after they occur, making it difficult to meet the requirements of precise real-time detection. The YOLOv5-PSG model proposed in this paper improves the YOLOv5 model. After 300 rounds of training, the average recognition accuracy rate of mAP can reach 93.1%, and the accuracy rate can reach approximately 0.802. After 300 rounds of training and learning, the confidence level can reach about 0.965. This improvement makes fire early warning and prediction more comprehensive and effective, ultimately protecting human life and the environment by mitigating the impact of wildfires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.