Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557531›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Advanced Characterization and Rejuvenation of End-Of-Life Lithium-Ion Anodes: Toward the Development of a Green Upcycling Route.

Luke Sweeney, Alexander T Sargent, Yuhang Dai, Shangwei Zhou, Jianuo Chen, Francesco Iacoviello, Rhodri Jervis, Phoebe K Allan, Peter R Slater, Charles Monroe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luke SweeneySchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alexander T SargentSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Yuhang DaiDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Shangwei ZhouElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-6118
Jianuo ChenElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Francesco IacovielloElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Rhodri JervisThe Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.
Phoebe K AllanSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter R SlaterSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Charles MonroeThe Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.
Paul A AndersonSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-7281
Paul R ShearingThe Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.
Wenjia DuThe Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8434-4764

Funding

Faraday Institution EP/S003053/1Faraday Institution FIRG024Faraday Institution FIRG027Faraday Institution FIRG050Faraday Institution FIRG057Faraday Institution FIRG085Royal Academy of Engineering CiET1718/59STFC Batteries Network ST/R006873/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited duty cycles of EV batteries necessitate robust end-of-life strategies to prevent landfilling and enable responsible resource management. Recycling remains the ultimate fate for battery waste, yet current hydrometallurgical practices rely on often lengthy and energy-intensive methods, which provide a major incentive for the development of cost-effective, shorter-loop regeneration routes to recycle end-of-life electrodes. This proof-of-concept study investigates the efficacy of deionized (DI) water and ascorbic acid (AA) in recovering entire spent anode systems from retired EV batteries without delamination and re-manufacture. Multi-modal characterization techniques were used to evaluate electrochemical, physicochemical, and morphological changes before and after treatment. High-resolution X-ray tomography and image-based simulations were used to quantify the microstructural metrics of pretreated and rejuvenated anodes. 3D visualizations of graphite and pore phases revealed insights into recycling mechanisms and rejuvenation effectiveness. Results demonstrate that DI water effectively removed surface impurities on graphite, significantly enhancing regeneration performance, with stable discharge capacities of ∼2.65 mAh/cm

Indexed as

3D microstructuregraphite electroderecyclingregenerationX‐ray tomography

Identifiers

PMID41557531
PMCPMC12965121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.