ReviewJAMA internal medicine2026
Navigating Postacute Care Options for Patients After Hospital Discharge: A Review.
Review in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Discharge Destination and Excess Length of Stay in Heart Failure-Related Admissions: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 25% to 40% of hospitalized adults are discharged to receive postacute care (PAC) either at home through home health (HH) or in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), or long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). An overview of various PAC settings is needed to help hospital-based clinicians collaborate most effectively with patients, caregivers, and an interdisciplinary care team to promote high-quality PAC and facilitate better PAC transitions. Observations: PAC settings vary in their eligibility requirements and in the intensity and complexity of services they provide. HH provides intermittent in-home support for homebound individuals with skilled needs. SNFs provide housing, daily nursing care, rehabilitative services, and medical supervision, although the medical care provided is often a dramatic step down from hospital-based acute care. IRFs provide intensive rehabilitation, most commonly for individuals with specific diagnoses (eg stroke, hip fracture, or spinal cord injury). LTACHs care for patients with medically complex conditions who require prolonged hospital-level care for services (eg, ventilator weaning, complex wound management). Discharge planning to PAC should be guided by clinical needs, caregiver support, and the values and preferences of patients and caregivers; yet it is often opaque and influenced by external factors such as insurance coverage and geography. Clinicians should proactively recognize PAC needs, advocate for specific PAC settings for targeted situations, and assist on selecting an appropriate PAC facility, especially for patients with insurance restrictions. Moreover, PAC admissions frequently represent a pivotal time period for individuals with serious illness, during which a subsequent poor prognosis becomes clear. Therefore, PAC stays represent an opportunity for clinicians to revisit prognosis with patients and caregivers, engage in goals of care conversations, and clarify plans for the future. Conclusions and Relevance: To provide patient-centered care and help facilitate better transitions for patients and caregivers, hospital-based clinicians have a responsibility to understand the different types of PAC settings and actively participate in discharge planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.