Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557438›Full record

ReviewJAMA internal medicine2026

Navigating Postacute Care Options for Patients After Hospital Discharge: A Review.

W James Deardorff, Robert E Burke, Anil N Makam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W James DeardorffDivision of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Robert E BurkeDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Anil N MakamPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Enhancing prognosis communication for older adults in skilled nursing facilitiesK76AG094730 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI William James Deardorff · 2025 to 2026
$480k
A comprehensive prognostic model for older adults discharged to skilled nursing facilities.R03AG082859 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DEARDORFF, WILLIAM JAMES · 2023 to 2024
$323k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG094730NIA NIH HHS R03 AG082859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 25% to 40% of hospitalized adults are discharged to receive postacute care (PAC) either at home through home health (HH) or in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), or long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). An overview of various PAC settings is needed to help hospital-based clinicians collaborate most effectively with patients, caregivers, and an interdisciplinary care team to promote high-quality PAC and facilitate better PAC transitions. Observations: PAC settings vary in their eligibility requirements and in the intensity and complexity of services they provide. HH provides intermittent in-home support for homebound individuals with skilled needs. SNFs provide housing, daily nursing care, rehabilitative services, and medical supervision, although the medical care provided is often a dramatic step down from hospital-based acute care. IRFs provide intensive rehabilitation, most commonly for individuals with specific diagnoses (eg stroke, hip fracture, or spinal cord injury). LTACHs care for patients with medically complex conditions who require prolonged hospital-level care for services (eg, ventilator weaning, complex wound management). Discharge planning to PAC should be guided by clinical needs, caregiver support, and the values and preferences of patients and caregivers; yet it is often opaque and influenced by external factors such as insurance coverage and geography. Clinicians should proactively recognize PAC needs, advocate for specific PAC settings for targeted situations, and assist on selecting an appropriate PAC facility, especially for patients with insurance restrictions. Moreover, PAC admissions frequently represent a pivotal time period for individuals with serious illness, during which a subsequent poor prognosis becomes clear. Therefore, PAC stays represent an opportunity for clinicians to revisit prognosis with patients and caregivers, engage in goals of care conversations, and clarify plans for the future. Conclusions and Relevance: To provide patient-centered care and help facilitate better transitions for patients and caregivers, hospital-based clinicians have a responsibility to understand the different types of PAC settings and actively participate in discharge planning.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeSubacute CareContinuity of Patient CareHome Care ServicesHumansRehabilitation CentersSkilled Nursing Facilities

Identifiers

PMID41557438
PMCPMC13112543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.