ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026
The Diversity Effect of Psychological Resilience on the Relationship between Bullying Victimization and Multiple Psychological Symptoms Among Chinese Adolescents: A Large-Scale Regional Study.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the relationship between bullying victimization and multiple psychological symptoms among Chinese adolescents and to evaluate the moderating role of psychological resilience in this relationship. Using large-scale regional data from a county in northeastern China (N = 22,264), we identified bullying victimization subtypes through latent class analysis (LCA), quantified comorbidity risks via multinomial logistic regression, and examined the moderating effects of resilience across subgroups. Three victimization profiles emerged: non-victimized (80.9%), moderately victimized (13.6%), and poly-victimized (5.5%) groups. Compared to the non-victimized group, the moderately victimized group demonstrated higher odds ratios (ORs) for multiple psychological symptoms (all three symptoms: OR = 6.872; any two symptoms: OR = 4.470; any one symptom: OR = 2.610). The poly-victimized group exhibited significantly higher odds across all symptom categories (all three symptoms: OR = 43.678; any two symptoms: OR = 18.246; any one symptom: OR = 5.974). Resilience demonstrated heterogeneous moderation effects: it showed no significant interaction in the moderately victimized group, whereas it was associated with significant risk amplification in the poly-victimized group (OR = 1.040, p < 0.001). Bullying victimization is significantly associated with concurrent psychological symptoms. However, resilience does not universally buffer against stress. For adolescents subjected to severe poly-victimization, high levels of resilience appear to amplify psychological risks instead of providing a buffering effect. The findings suggest that tailored intervention strategies should prioritize victimization severity rather than adopt a universal resilience-promotion approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.