Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557241›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026

Designability of α-Helical Protein Filaments.

Abhinaba Das, Vincent Conticello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhinaba DasDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vincent ConticelloDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. vcontic@emory.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helix-helix interactions are mediated through highly designable interfaces within tertiary and quaternary structures of proteins and protein assemblies. The structural regularity of these interfaces suggests that ordered self-assembled structures could be constructed from implementation of these interactions between appropriately designed helical protomers. This review summarizes the current understanding of helix-helix interactions within different classes of naturally occurring α-helical protein filaments. The implications of this structural information for the de novo design of synthetic filamentous nanomaterials will be discussed with reference to examples in which these principles have been successfully implemented. A specific case study will focus on the designability of cross-α helical filaments, a recently discovered structural class in which the helical protomers are arranged in a perpendicular orientation with respect to the protofilament axis. This discussion will include an evaluation of the frequency of occurrence of cross-α interfaces in the PDB, the effectiveness of structural prediction from sequence information, and the potential for de novo design of interfaces that promote cross-α interactions.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringProteinsAnimalsHumansModels, MolecularProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProteinsCoiled-coilCross-α filamentDesignabilityHelical interfacesPeptideProteinSelf-assembly

Identifiers

PMID41557241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.