Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557240›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026

Biology and Molecular Structure of the α-Fibrous Silks in Bees, Ants, Wasps and Hornets (Hymenoptera).

Caitlin Johnston, Lyndall Briggs, Michelle Michie, Tara D Sutherland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caitlin JohnstonCSIRO, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Lyndall BriggsCSIRO, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Michelle MichieCSIRO, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Tara D SutherlandCSIRO, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Tara.Sutherland@CSIRO.AU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larval aculeate insects (bees, ants and hornets) have evolved a silk for cocoon and nest construction based on entirely different design principles from the convergently evolved silk of spiders and silkworms. The silk is based on the coiled coil protein structure: a structure proposed in the 1950s by Francis Crick, where multiple α-helical proteins wrap around each other to form a supercoil. Whilst now recognised as a ubiquitous protein assembly motif, the purity of silk pulled from the honeybee silk gland made it one of the earliest experimentally validated examples of this structure. Here, we describe the current state of understanding of the relationship between the coiled coil structure and aculeate silk biology gained from early studies dating from the mid-twentieth century up to the present time. Further, efforts to replicate the natural material and functional materials generated from the silk are outlined. Finally, we consider the future of research in this area, focusing on mimicking natural silk and the use of recombinant silk for rational design of functional materials.

Indexed as

AntsHymenopteraInsect ProteinsSilkWaspsAnimalsBeesInsect ProteinsSilkAntBeeCoiled coilCross-linkHornetHymenopteraProtein materialsRational designSilk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.