ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Microbial stewardship for sustainable dye remediation with a special emphasis on consortia engineering, computational techniques, and microbial bioprospecting.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial discharges contaminated with synthetic dyes are responsible for causing serious harm to ecology and living beings. Current knowledge on microorganism-based technologies for removing dyes has been synthesized in this review. To promote scalability and safety in bioremediation, emphasis has been placed on single isolates, engineered and natural consortia, genetically modified strains, computational prescreening, the role of mediators and energy supplements, analytical workflows, and ecotoxicity assessment. In summary, multispecies consortia are more resilient than single isolates and can decolorize broad-spectrum dyes. Azoreductases, laccases, and ligninolytic peroxidases remain the dominant enzymes that catalyze this process. Sometimes, better mineralization in downstream processes is achieved with microaerophilic or sequential anaerobic‒aerobic systems. Prescreening by computational (docking, homology modeling, metabolic reconstructions) and in silico methods minimizes the time and labor required for selecting the appropriate candidate and provides critical insights into enzyme-dye complementarity. While a multiple-fold rate increase is achieved with additional redox mediators and co-substrates, treated effluent may also retain or generate toxic intermediates, which underscores that visual decolorization does not represent detoxification. Although the performance of the process can be improved by engineering principles (top-down enrichment, bottom-up synthetic consortia, and spatial immobilization) and targeted genetic transfers, biosafety and scale-up challenges are the major drawbacks of these processes. Industrial translation of microbe-based systems requires standardized toxicity assessments, the design of adaptable reactors, and regular containment and life-cycle assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.