ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Clinical frailty score for hospital outcome for patients aged ≥ 75 following emergency department resuscitation room admission: a retrospective monocenter study.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elderly patients (≥ 75 years) often require resuscitation room (RR) care in the emergency department (ED), yet decisions regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission remain complex. Assessment of quality of life and frailty is necessary to determine the level of care required for elderly patients. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a validated tool for assessing frailty and predicting mortality, but its role in ICU triage remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the CFS of patients admitted to the ICU with those admitted to the general inpatient unit (GIU) after receiving initial intensive care. This was a retrospective, single-center study including patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the ED RR from November 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The primary outcome was the comparison of CFS between ICU and GIU admissions after RR management. Secondary outcomes included predictive performance of CFS for ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. Of the 392 patients enrolled, 170 (43%) were admitted to the ICU and 222 (57%) to the GIU. The median CFS was 3 (2-4) in ICU-admitted patients and 4 (3-5) in GIU-admitted patients (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rate was 30/170 (18%) in the ICU-admitted group and 35/222 (16%) in the GIU-admitted group (p = 0.72). CFS predictive value for ICU admission had an area under the curve of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.63-0.73) and for in-hospital mortality of 0.62 (95%CI: 0.55-0.69). In elderly patients admitted to the RR, CFS values differed between those admitted to ICU and those admitted to GIU. However, the discriminative performance of CFS for hospital orientation and in-hospital mortality was limited. These findings suggest that frailty assessment may contribute to the overall evaluation of elderly patients in the ED RR but should be interpreted in conjunction with acute severity scores and clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.