ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
Kinetic and thermodynamic evaluation of lipid and pigment extraction from Nannochloropsis oculata by ultrasound-assisted and conventional methods.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Techno-economic analysis of bioactive-rich oil production from Nannochloropsis oculata.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional extraction of lipids and pigments involves the use of toxic solvents and long extraction times potentially leading to degradation of the target compounds. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) has emerged as a promising alternative, capable of enabling high yields under milder conditions and shorter extraction times. This study investigated the extraction kinetics of lipids, chlorophylls, and carotenoids from Nannochloropsis oculata using 75% (v/v) ethanol at 20–60 °C, with and without ultrasound, and compared the results with conventional extraction. Optimal extraction conditions were identified as 8 min with ultrasound for lipids, 30 min without ultrasound for chlorophylls, and 4 min without ultrasound for carotenoids, all at 60 °C, reaching 86.2%, 68.1%, and 67.6% of the total content in the biomass, respectively. The pseudo-second order (PSO) model best described the extraction kinetics for all compounds, presenting higher coefficients of determination (R2) and lower root mean square errors (RMSE) compared to the pseudo-first order (PFO) model. This suggests extracellular film diffusion around the solid particles was not the rate-limiting step of mass transfer. Thermodynamic analysis revealed endothermic behavior and increased process spontaneity at higher temperatures . Overall, ultrasound had minimal effect on extraction yields, suggesting that the disruption observed was mainly driven by the solvent effect. Nonetheless, 75% ethanol proved effective, achieving high recoveries without toxic solvents. These results provide insights for sustainable microalgal biocompound extraction and highlight the need for more complex kinetic models considering both intra- and extracellular mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.