ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Medical education and abortion care: evaluating an interdisciplinary learning module in Germany.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gender differences in attitudes towards abortion: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, first-trimester abortions are legally restricted but allowed under certain conditions, including mandatory counseling and a reflection period. Accessibility concerns persist. To address gaps in medical training, we developed an interdisciplinary learning module on first-trimester abortion care.
methodsWe piloted the module in two sessions giving access to all medical students as an extracurricular learning opportunity. We conducted non-paired surveys across the medical school prior to the module and with our participants after the module to identify changes in attitudes as well as in intentions to treat.
resultsWe received a total of 297 responses. Most of the students (94%) were in favor of legalizing abortion laws. However, only 30% self-assessed their knowledge as sufficient, 40% of the students showed the willingness to perform abortions within the consultation clause and 43% of the students agreed to consult patients on abortion provision but not perform them themselves. The right for practitioners to object the performance of abortions was highly agreed upon (78%). After our pilot sessions, we received 53 evaluation surveys from 118 participants. Students reported a significant increase in knowledge. We observed a significant increase in general support and intention to treat after our module.
conclusionsTeaching about abortion is essential for our future healthcare providers. Overall, we see a great response to our new learning module and can hope for practice-changing effects on the provision of abortion care in the future. We integrated the module into our regular teaching catalogue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.