ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Digital maternity care in Germany: a cross-sectional web-based survey on midwives' perceptions.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMaternity care is a central component of any healthcare system and is largely provided by midwives. Considering increasing cost pressures and growing demand for efficiency within the German healthcare system, the development of efficient, digitally supported care models are both encouraged and actively promoted, especially in pregnancy. However, to date, no such model has been sustainably established in the field of maternity care. In particular, the perspectives of midwives have largely been neglected.
methodsAs part of an initial needs assessment for the Participatory Design of a digitally supported maternity care model, this study uses a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire to explore midwives' perceptions of their current work situation, use of digital tools and digital pregnancy care.
results92.2% of participants (n = 129) perceive increasing strain on maternity care in Germany (5-point Likert; M = 4.49, SD = ± 0.69). 87.6% use a variety of digital tools in their professional environment, yet unvalidated and unauthorized solutions. Self-perceived digital competence is high (10-point NRS; 7.09 ± 1.48). The intention to use the technology decreases in parallel with the level of awareness, being highest for the electronic patient record (5-point Likert; 72.1%; 3.84 ± 0.97) and lowest for artificial intelligence (38.8%; 3.17 ± 1.05).
conclusionThe study highlights midwives' openness to digital solutions, their active, though informal, use of such tools, and emphasizes the need to integrate their perspectives into the development of certified, sustainable digital care models in maternity care within an increasingly strained healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.