ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Evaluation of agmatine's anti-cancer efficacy in Caco-2 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agmatine Sulfate Is Associated with Altered Redox Status, Apoptosis-Associated Responses, and AKT/JNK Signalling in Ishikawa Endometrial Cancer Cells.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of agmatine efficacy in contrast-induced nephropathy: experimental evidence in rat model.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2026Article
- The role of L-Arginine metabolism in the hallmarks of cancer as an emerging pathway to drug design.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of agmatine on cell viability, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and the expression of the ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2 genes in the Caco-2 colon cancer cell line. Agmatine efficacy was assessed thruogh proliferation, migration, and invasion assays at various concentrations. The apoptotic index was determined using apoptosis-related markers (Bax, Bcl-2, Csp-3) via apoptosis assays, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and Western blot analysis. Expression levels of the ABCG2, ABCB1, and ABCC1 genes were measured by qRT-PCR in agmatine-treated Caco-2 cells. Oxidative stress markers, including glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT), were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Cell viability analysis revealed that agmatine exerted its most pronounced effects at 72 h, with significant reductions at concentrations of 6, 7.3, and 9 mM in Caco-2 cells and 6, 6.25, and 9 mM in L929 cells (p < 0.05). At these concentrations, migration and invasion assays showed dose-dependent decreases in cell motility and invasiveness in Caco-2 cells. Apoptosis analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the apoptotic index with rising agmatine concentrations. Significant decreases in GPx and CAT were observed in all three agmatine-treated Caco-2 groups compared to untreated controls (p < 0.01). However, the expression levels of ABCG2, ABCB1, and ABCC1 showed no significant changes following agmatine treatment (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that agmatine exerts antiproliferative, anti-migratory, anti-invasive, and pro-apoptotic effects in Caco-2 colon cancer cells, potentially through the modulation of apoptosis- and oxidative stress-related pathways. The lack of significant impacts on ABC transporter gene expression suggests that agmatine may be a promising candidate molecule for further translational studies in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.