Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557144›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Evaluation of ICAM and VCAM as biomarkers in serum and bronchoscopic lavage samples of lung cancer patients.

Burcu Nur Gülbahar, Alperen Aksakal, Buğra Kerget, Nurinnisa Öztürk, Ömer Araz, Elif Yılmazel Uçar, Leyla Sağlam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Burcu Nur GülbaharDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Alperen AksakalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey. alperennaksakal@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-3314
Buğra KergetDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Nurinnisa ÖztürkDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ömer ArazDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Elif Yılmazel UçarDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Leyla SağlamDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Yakutiye Medical Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Yakutiye, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic potential of adhesion molecules ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 by analyzing their levels in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from patients with lung cancer.

methodsThis prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted at the chest diseases clinic of Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine from March 2024 to May 2025. Patients diagnosed with malignant or benign lung disease by bronchoscopy, along with a control group of healthy volunteers, were included in the study. Serum samples were collected from all participants, and BAL samples were obtained from the patient groups. ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 levels were measured by ELISA. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software package. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with ROC analysis, and 1-year survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsIn the lung cancer group, ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 levels in serum and BAL samples were significantly higher compared to the benign and control groups (p < 0.001 for all). BAL ICAM-2 level showed the highest diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.990; sensitivity and specificity: 96.4%). Serum ICAM-2 and ICAM-1 also showed high diagnostic performance. BAL ICAM-1 levels were significantly higher in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (p = 0.036). High serum ICAM-1 and BAL ICAM-2 levels were associated with mortality (p = 0.048 and p = 0.015, respectively).

conclusionsSerum and BAL levels of ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 show promise as potential diagnostic biomarkers for lung cancer. Among these, BAL ICAM-2 levels are especially notable due to their high diagnostic accuracy and link to survival.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCell Adhesion MoleculesIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Lung NeoplasmsVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1AdultAgedAntigens, CDBronchoscopyCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesICAM1 protein, humanICAM2 protein, humanIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1BiomarkerBronchoalveolar lavageDiagnosisICAM-1ICAM-2Lung cancerPrognosisVCAM-1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.