SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Evidence-based indications for proton therapy in adults determined using the GRADE approach.
Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProton therapy (PT) offers dosimetric advantages over conventional X-ray-based radiotherapy (XRT), aiming to reduce toxicity and better spare healthy tissues. The Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), commissioned by the Spanish Ministry of Health, conducted a Health Technology Assessment to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of PT for cancer indications not yet approved for PT in Spain. This article summarizes the main findings regarding PT's safety and clinical performance in adults compared with XRT.
methodsThe assessment was based on a systematic review of primary studies published between 2012 and 2024, following Cochrane methodological standards, PRISMA guidelines, and the GRADE approach. Eligibility criteria were defined using the PICO-DT framework, focusing on adult cancer patients, comparative study designs, and primary outcomes including serious adverse events, mortality, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I depending on study design. Searches covered major biomedical databases.
resultsOf 6958 records screened, 76 were included (five randomized trials and 71 observational studies) across 16 tumour types. Overall, evidence certainty was low or very low, limited by few randomized trials, methodological concerns, and heterogeneity. For some indications, including leptomeningeal metastases, lung cancer, and anal cancer, evidence suggests that PT may be equivalent or superior to XRT, although certainty remains limited.
conclusionsPT shows variable, cancer-specific results and does not consistently outperform XRT. Some indications appear promising, but substantial evidence gaps persist, emphasizing the need for high-quality comparative studies and systematic clinical data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.